perturbation stability
Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?
Adversarial training is a powerful type of defense against adversarial examples. Previous empirical results suggest that adversarial training requires wider networks for better performances. However, it remains elusive how does neural network width affect model robustness. In this paper, we carefully examine the relationship between network width and model robustness. Specifically, we show that the model robustness is closely related to the tradeoff between natural accuracy and perturbation stability, which is controlled by the robust regularization parameter λ.
Appendix introduction
The Appendix is organized as follows: In Appendix A, we state the symbols and notation used in this paper. In Appendix B, we provide the proofs and related lemmas of Theorem 1. In Appendix C, we provide the proofs of Theorem 2. In Appendix D, we provide the proofs and related lemmas of Theorem 3. In Appendix F, we discuss several limitations of this work. Finally, in Appendix G, we discuss the societal impact of this paper. In the paper, vectors are indicated with bold small letters, matrices with bold capital letters.
Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?
Adversarial training is a powerful type of defense against adversarial examples. Previous empirical results suggest that adversarial training requires wider networks for better performances. However, it remains elusive how does neural network width affect model robustness. In this paper, we carefully examine the relationship between network width and model robustness. Specifically, we show that the model robustness is closely related to the tradeoff between natural accuracy and perturbation stability, which is controlled by the robust regularization parameter λ.